

Staying the Course
The first checkoff-funded National Beef Tenderness
Survey was conducted in 1990 to compile baseline information on the tenderness
of beef in the retail case. The 1990 Survey utilized Warner-Bratzler shear
(WBS) force tests and trained sensory panels to evaluate the tenderness of
retail beef and found significant problems with tenderness in cuts from the
chuck, round and top sirloin. Recommendations made following this survey led
to significant improvements in overall beef tenderness. The 1999 National
Beef Tenderness Survey was commissioned to evaluate the industry for progress
made in tenderness following the findings of the 1990 Survey.
Unlike the first study, the 1999 version was expanded to include products from food service facilities in order to fully characterize the state of beef tenderness throughout the industry. The 1999 Survey revealed a 20% increase in tenderness as compared to 1990, indicating significant improvements in the management of our product. This 20% increase was attributed to several factors. First, the 1999 Survey discovered fewer ‘no-roll’ steaks (steaks without a grade designation) and more steaks grading High Choice or Prime than in the 1990 study. The 1999 National Beef Tenderness Survey also noted longer, more gradual chilling procedures than those seen in 1990. This shift away from rapid chilling likely reduced toughness problems associated with cold shortening/cold toughening.
Top sirloin steaks demonstrated improved performance over 1990, explained by a decrease in the incidence of injectionsite blemishes and associated toughness. Continuing education efforts, supported by The Beef Checkoff, are credited with this reduction and subsequent tenderness increase.
Tenderness aging periods for retail also increased as compared to 1990 survey records. “Each time we measure the eating quality of beef in these surveys, it keeps getting better. The impact of science and technology to understand and improve beef palatability, much of which has been funded by The Beef Checkoff program, is making a difference,” says Jeff Savell, Ph.D., Texas A&M University.
Despite noticeable improvements over 1990, 1999 Survey results indicated that tenderness issues still existed and needed to be properly addressed. These issues were most noticeable in cuts originating from the round.
Providing a benchmark for beef tenderness allows the industry to identify where improvements have been made and where tenderness issues may still exist. In 2005, The Beef Checkoff commissioned a follow-up study to the 1990 and 1999 Surveys to quantify continuing progress made by the beef industry to improve tenderness. “Although the beef industry has made significant advancements through The Beef Checkoff program with regard to enhancing beef tenderness and consistency, it is critical that the industry remains committed to improving beef tenderness, especially in the chuck and round cuts of the carcass,” says J.O. ‘Bo’ Reagan, Ph.D., Vice President of Research & Knowledge Management at NCBA.
Researchers at Texas A&M University collaborated with researchers from
California Polytechnic State University, Oklahoma State University, Pennsylvania
State University, South Dakota State University, Texas Tech University, the
University of Florida, and the University of Missouri to complete the survey.
|
|||
|
|||